Skip to main content

Western Civ as a legal revolution. The modern is so medieval

It is known to many historians that the names of epochs which they use to teach history are a double-edged sword, that helps get across some patterns of events, but obscures some other deeper ones.

An example which interests me is the way in which the medieval western Europe's "modernity" is so misunderstood.

A large number of reasonably educated people understand that the written constitutions and legal revolutions of modernity were very important parts of what makes our period different in practice. They also will know, many of them, that the great legislators of the French and American revolutions were inspired by examples from classical Greece and Rome. They were looking back past the darkness of the "middle" period in western Europe and trying to re-establish some virtuous aspects of those lost civilizations.

But everyone seems to miss that a written constitution, a contract which aims to set rules for the benefit of a large free community, is as medieval as you could get. What are these constitutions but just old style city charters writ large?

Medieval history, not Roman or Greek history, is to an amazing extent all about charters and complex legal debates. It is arguably what distinguishes it from all other periods of human history, but also what most unites it with the modern politics it spawned.

The rational and practical approach to law which the medieval church may take much credit for, was something new which did have classical roots, but which had never long stopped evolving and improving.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Keeping the club running. Corporations and other legal "persons" are important, and the importance of continuity is one reason.

It is not something people seem to notice much, if they even think about it at all, but the existence of "legal persons" is behind some of the greatest dilemmas we face today, covering a wide range of topics which define the headlines every day. On the one hand, there are relatively obvious legalistic discussions about this concept. For example, in America, among the various institutional causes of the political malaise there today, at least in more learnèd discussions, one has been the Supreme Court's acceptance of the argument that lobbying corporations have "freedom of speech". Perhaps less obviously connected to such legal discussions, is the widespread concern about the worsening of income distribution in rich countries, and the increasingly obvious ability of the wealthy to avoid paying taxes. At least in a superficial way, this is so widely understood that it has spread all over social media. But what kind of problem is this, if it is not another one wher

Western Civ

Is the concept of "the West" destined to be useless in normal discussions? Academics have lots of interesting things to say about it; but they struggle to say anything which spreads far from their various specialized fields, without a lot being lost and distorted. At the same time, the general public tends to constantly be attracted to extremists and caricatures. People tend to gravitate either to thinly disguised racial thinking, all about whether Europeans were better or worse or more aggressive or more rational, or whatever, than other people. Or; when people consciously try to avoid this they tend to simply take the opposite position of saying that it was all dumb luck, and being in the right place at the right time. What most thoughtful approaches have in common is that they try to look at for human traditions that were unique; and which made a difference. The general public tends to be vaguely aware of such ideas, but even among scholars the common threads which